<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Do you support Wikipedia?  News from the Trenches of the Science Wars 2.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stuartgeiger.com/wordpress/academic-works/2008/12/08/do-you-support-wikipedia-news-from-the-trenches-of-the-science-wars-2.0/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stuartgeiger.com/wordpress/academic-works/2008/12/08/do-you-support-wikipedia-news-from-the-trenches-of-the-science-wars-2.0/</link>
	<description>Technically Human</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 08:53:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The end of Wikipedia as we know it (eng) &#124; BodySpaceSociety</title>
		<link>http://www.stuartgeiger.com/wordpress/academic-works/2008/12/08/do-you-support-wikipedia-news-from-the-trenches-of-the-science-wars-2.0/comment-page-1/#comment-699</link>
		<dc:creator>The end of Wikipedia as we know it (eng) &#124; BodySpaceSociety</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 15:39:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stuartgeiger.com/wordpress/?p=213#comment-699</guid>
		<description>[...] in the current intellectual debate over scientific authority, we&#8217;re actually fighting the academic equivalent of Star Wars, last thing we need here is to discover that the rebel HQ Coruscant has been replaced by the Death [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in the current intellectual debate over scientific authority, we&#8217;re actually fighting the academic equivalent of Star Wars, last thing we need here is to discover that the rebel HQ Coruscant has been replaced by the Death [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ailsa haxell</title>
		<link>http://www.stuartgeiger.com/wordpress/academic-works/2008/12/08/do-you-support-wikipedia-news-from-the-trenches-of-the-science-wars-2.0/comment-page-1/#comment-689</link>
		<dc:creator>ailsa haxell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 23:22:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stuartgeiger.com/wordpress/?p=213#comment-689</guid>
		<description>I enjoyed your bringing of Latour to the validity claims of wikipedia: 
Bruno Latour, whose social study of science questioned scientific inquiry by showing how the output of scientific effort is materially affected by the technosocial institutions. 
Your essay stop short of describing knowledge as not only created but held as &#039;truth&#039; within sociotechnical institutions. 
What then of competing sociotechnical institutions.  Not about goodness or badness but how relations to knowledge get reframed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I enjoyed your bringing of Latour to the validity claims of wikipedia:<br />
Bruno Latour, whose social study of science questioned scientific inquiry by showing how the output of scientific effort is materially affected by the technosocial institutions.<br />
Your essay stop short of describing knowledge as not only created but held as &#8216;truth&#8217; within sociotechnical institutions.<br />
What then of competing sociotechnical institutions.  Not about goodness or badness but how relations to knowledge get reframed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gregory Kohs</title>
		<link>http://www.stuartgeiger.com/wordpress/academic-works/2008/12/08/do-you-support-wikipedia-news-from-the-trenches-of-the-science-wars-2.0/comment-page-1/#comment-687</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregory Kohs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 14:16:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stuartgeiger.com/wordpress/?p=213#comment-687</guid>
		<description>Much of your thesis is based on a view that the Nature &quot;study&quot; was credible and fair.  Many have argued that it was not.  Not even close.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Much of your thesis is based on a view that the Nature &#8220;study&#8221; was credible and fair.  Many have argued that it was not.  Not even close.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
