<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Perils of Keyword-Based Bibliometrics: ISI&#8217;s &#8217;1990 Effect&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stuartgeiger.com/wordpress/random-thoughts/2010/02/05/perils-of-keyword-based-bibliometrics-isis-1990-effect/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stuartgeiger.com/wordpress/random-thoughts/2010/02/05/perils-of-keyword-based-bibliometrics-isis-1990-effect/</link>
	<description>Technically Human</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 08:53:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Stern</title>
		<link>http://www.stuartgeiger.com/wordpress/random-thoughts/2010/02/05/perils-of-keyword-based-bibliometrics-isis-1990-effect/comment-page-1/#comment-951</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Stern</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2011 16:21:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stuartgeiger.com/wordpress/?p=316#comment-951</guid>
		<description>Although keyword based through the 90s, search fields now can (I think) scan an entire document for words entered through document processing with OCR-like software. Google Books is one example, where documents originally produced only in print and scanned are now searchable digitally.  Would a text-based search over keyword provide more robust results avoiding the effect here? This would assume that any included searchable journal had also completed a text-recognition project on all previous publications included in the given collection. Certainly room for error if documents are excluded or mis-scanned, but there must be a way that OCR&#039;d documents can be quality-checked for searchability first.  Thoughts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although keyword based through the 90s, search fields now can (I think) scan an entire document for words entered through document processing with OCR-like software. Google Books is one example, where documents originally produced only in print and scanned are now searchable digitally.  Would a text-based search over keyword provide more robust results avoiding the effect here? This would assume that any included searchable journal had also completed a text-recognition project on all previous publications included in the given collection. Certainly room for error if documents are excluded or mis-scanned, but there must be a way that OCR&#8217;d documents can be quality-checked for searchability first.  Thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: L&#8217;effet ISI de 1990 : une augmentation artificielle de l&#8217;intérêt pour un sujet scientifique &#124; docnews</title>
		<link>http://www.stuartgeiger.com/wordpress/random-thoughts/2010/02/05/perils-of-keyword-based-bibliometrics-isis-1990-effect/comment-page-1/#comment-945</link>
		<dc:creator>L&#8217;effet ISI de 1990 : une augmentation artificielle de l&#8217;intérêt pour un sujet scientifique &#124; docnews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 09:47:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stuartgeiger.com/wordpress/?p=316#comment-945</guid>
		<description>[...] via Perils of Keyword-Based Bibliometrics: ISI’s ’1990 Effect’ &#124; R. Stuart Geiger. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] via Perils of Keyword-Based Bibliometrics: ISI’s ’1990 Effect’ | R. Stuart Geiger. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
